Code review that proves its fixes.
Every AI reviewer proposes fixes. Korvu runs your build and your tests in a sandbox before a fix is proposed — and attaches the evidence.
Three things wrong with AI code review.
The tools got good at writing comments. None of them are accountable for whether the fix they wrote actually works.
A fix nobody ran
AI reviewers generate fixes — they don’t execute them. The category norm is a build check at best, and the suggestion ships even when that check fails.
category norm: ships-on-failNoise isn’t review
Comment walls and style nitpicks. Volume stands in for judgment, and nothing on the thread proves which finding actually matters.
no proof of what mattersYour code on their cloud
Hosted-only reviewers, with self-hosting gated behind 500-seat enterprise tiers. Your diffs leave your infrastructure on day one.
self-host: enterprise-gatedReview. Fix. Verify. Propose.
One loop per finding. Verification is the gate in the middle — nothing reaches your branch without passing through it.
Review
Reads the diff with repo context. Findings are ranked, not sprayed — a short list of what matters.
Fix
Authors a candidate patch for findings that warrant one. A draft — not yet trusted.
Verify
Runs your repo’s own build and test suite against the patch, in an ephemeral sandbox. Pass, or the fix doesn’t ship — there is no third outcome.
fail → finding only, no commit
Propose
Verified fixes land as a commit or stacked PR, with the verification receipt attached.
Every fix arrives with its receipt.
Not a claim of correctness — a record of what ran. The receipt is attached to the commit, so the proof travels with the fix.
Core proves the fix. Cloud runs the fleet.
The whole loop — review, fix, verify, propose — is the open-source engine. Cloud is the managed layer around the same engine, nothing forked, nothing held back.
Korvu Core
AGPL-3.0 · open sourceThe full loop, self-hosted on your infrastructure. Any team size — no seat gate, no enterprise tier between you and your own deployment.
- Full review → fix → verify → propose loop
- Self-host at any size
- Bring your own LLM keys
- Sandbox verification on your runners
Korvu Cloud
waitlist · not GAThe same engine, operated for you. Cloud adds the management layer for teams that want the loop without running it.
- Managed credentials
- Tenants & access
- Billing & metering
- Delivery & dashboards
Where Korvu stands. Honestly.
No competitor logos, no cherry-picked benchmarks — the generic column is what the category typically offers. Cells marked in-development are exactly that.
| Capability | Korvu Core | Korvu Cloud | Typical AI reviewer |
|---|---|---|---|
| PR review | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Fix authorship | Yes | Yes | Common |
| Fix verified before proposed | In developmentKRV-194 | In developmentfollows Core | Build check at best — ships even on fail |
| Self-host at any size | Yesno seat gate | Managed service | Enterprise tiers only |
| OSS engine | YesAGPL-3.0 | Same engine | Proprietary |
| BYO LLM keys | Yes | Managed credentials | Varies by plan |
Join the Cloud waitlist.
Cloud adds the managed layer on top of the open-source engine — credentials, tenants, billing, delivery, and dashboards. It’s on a waitlist, not GA; we’re onboarding in small batches.
We’ll email when your workspace is ready. No GA date yet — and Core is open source if you’d rather not wait.